215/65 R15 Reifen

Habe diese Reifen auf allen meinen Lieferwagen. Sie halten gut genug, bekommen keine Reifenpannen ... sie sind gut genug.

Zwei Saisons ohne Probleme. Die Überraschung kam in der dritten Staffel. Die Reifen haben sich nur für 2500 km von 6,5 auf 4,5 mm abgenutzt. Dann wurden sie bei Trockenheit schlecht und bei Nässe gefährlich. Selbst bei etwas Nässe wurde das Auto rutschig. Die Leistung war so schlecht, dass ich einen Notfall-Federungscheck bekam und alles war in Ordnung, also war das Problem nur Nokian! Auf Wiedersehen - nie Nokian.

Ich fand diese in Ordnung im Trockenen und schockierend im Nassen. Ich hatte diese sowohl auf meinem Hiace als auch auf meiner Corona angebracht. Nasser Griff war auf Hügeln, Starts und Kurven nutzlos. Straßenlärm war der schlimmste aller Autoreifen, die ich je benutzt habe. Sie hatten das Gefühl, mein Auto trug Gummistiefel 3 Größen 2 groß!
Sie haben sich gut abgenutzt, nach 30.000 km im Van sind noch etwa 5 mm übrig, und sie bewältigen auch Schotterstraßen gut. Absolut nutzlos auf nassem Gras und Schlamm.

drove past warranty (4yrs. trouble-free ); handled well,both dry and wet. Key to success is proper tire pressure according to owner's manual, and regular rotation. Just purchased another set today-1-20-17

Had two Triangle CNTT GLS TR928 TYRES speed rated H100 fitted to front (drive) wheels on 2005 Kia Sedona. 8mm new tread depth, driven 1507 miles, 70℅ of these motorway. Overall a decent budget to mid-range tyre and good value. Tyre + valve + balance + fit = paid £45.00 each tyre. Checked wear at 1507 miles & still at 8mm. Previous 'performance' tyres rotated to rear so expected reduced response on steer but no noticeable difference. Likewise with grip on dry roads where grip was very good. Grip on wet - when stopping and cornering I noted a little reduction in performance but not to where I would feel unsafe. When setting off on a wet road performance is poor, particularly on an incline where any excess engine speed causes tyres to slip, even on my Sedona which is an automatic?? Road noise slightly increased, particularly on concrete sections of motorway but not excessive. Comfort- when first fitted I felt the steering quite hard and wasn't happy feeling every lump and bump on an uneven surface. Checked tyre pressures to find tyre fitters had grossly over-inflated to 52lb PSI. Once reduced to manufactures recommended pressure there was a huge improvement. TIP: Reduced by a further 4lb PSI & improved grip on wet road when setting off and tyre is far from being 'under-inflated. On a budget I would recommend this tyre.

these tyres are quite worth the price for the qualities it has. economy wise abit of improvement hardly noticable. comfort is very good at first when new nearly no noise but now after awhile starting to get noisier. grip levels are good but its fitted on an suv so yea.. tread wear still very good even though this car has been known to eat tyres because of its small width and heavy weight.

got some excellent advise and bought a set, seem to be very quite and a lot better than the kumo I had on

THE BAD: I have had the Verso xl on a ford escort and OMG were they bad, wheel spin and slide on corners, the car came with them and I have to ask what fool put Xl (extra load) tyres on a escort. too stiff in sidewall = loss of grip/traction

THE GOOD: Have them on a Toyota Granvia 3.4 petrol V6 Trd supercharged van converted to camper, so weight is around 2000kg. they are absolutely the best tyre for a heavy vehicle, I can corner harder, body roll is reduced, generally it has stiffened things up and reduced understeer greatly which was my want. I run them at 39/41psi as xl tyres need higher pressure.
they are a bit louder than some.

ONLY run XL tyre if your load/weight is higher than average and they will flex and grip enough and you will get great wear.
Put XLs on a light fwd car and you may as well just run on your rims