Beim AutoBild-Sommerreifentest 2024 wurden 20 Premium-Touren-Sommerreifen in der Größe 205/55 R16 getestet. Der Test konzentrierte sich auf mehrere wichtige Leistungsindikatoren, darunter Trocken- und Nassbremsen, Handling, Geräusch, Verschleiß, Wert und Rollwiderstand.
Der Michelin Primacy 4+ belegte den ersten Platz und demonstrierte eine ausgewogene Leistung mit kurzen Bremswegen und hoher Effizienz. Es folgten der Continental PremiumContact 7 und der Bridgestone Turanza 6, die eine starke Leistung auf nasser und trockener Straße und einen geringen Verschleiß zeigten.
Testveröffentlichung:
205/55 R16
21 Reifen
4 Kategorien
Bilder mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Auto Bild
Testveröffentlichung:
Bilder mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Auto Bild
Testgröße:
205/55 R16
Getestete Reifen:
21 Reifen
Trocken
Der Continental PremiumContact 7 und der Kumho Ecsta HS52 führten beim Trockenbremsen an, während das Referenzbudget deutlich schlechter abschnitt.
{Daten-2}
Beim Trockenhandling lag der Falken Ziex ZE310 vorne, knapp dahinter folgte der Vredestein Ultrac.
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- GT Radial FE2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Reference Budget
Nass
Continental führte erneut beim Nassbremsen, dieses Mal mit einem kleinen Vorsprung vor Kumho und Vredestein. Wie im Trockenen war der Referenz-Budgetreifen eine völlige Katastrophe.
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- GT Radial FE2
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Reference Budget
Der Vredestein Ultrac war im Nasshandling am schnellsten, wobei der Kumho erneut eine gute Leistung zeigte
{Daten-5}
Der Vredestein Ultrac war sowohl beim geraden als auch beim Kurven-Aquaplaning der Beste, wobei der Uniroyal Rainsport in beiden Tests in tieferem Wasser 5 Sekunden erreichte.
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- GT Radial FE2
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Reference Budget
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- GT Radial FE2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Reference Budget
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
Komfort
Der Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 hatte die geringsten Außengeräusche.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- GT Radial FE2
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Reference Budget
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Firestone RoadHawk
Wert
Der Goodyear hatte im Test auch die beste Profillebensdauer, deutlich vor Fulda, Michelin und Bridgestone.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- GT Radial FE2
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Vredestein Ultrac
Wenn man die Kosten des Reifens mit der voraussichtlichen Profillebensdauer vergleicht, erwiesen sich Fulda und Goodyear als das beste Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis, wobei der Fulda der einzige Reifen war, der weniger als 8 Euro pro 1000/km kostete. Der Vredestein war dank des sehr geringen Verschleißes mehr als doppelt so teuer.
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- GT Radial FE2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Vredestein Ultrac
Den ersten Sieg errang der Dunlop Sport BluResponse mit dem geringsten Rollwiderstand, knapp vor seiner Schwestermarke Goodyear.
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4
- Firestone RoadHawk
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4
- Uniroyal RainSport 5
- Bridgestone Turanza 6
- Fulda EcoControl HP2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Continental PremiumContact 7
- Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
- GT Radial FE2
- Kumho Ecsta HS52
- Nexen N Fera Primus
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Reference Budget
- Giti GitiSynergyH2
Ergebnisse
Ausgewogen, hohes Leistungspotenzial, gute Handlingeigenschaften, kurze Trockenbremswege, vorbildliche Laufleistung und Wirtschaftlichkeit.
Keiner erwähnt.
Exemplarisch.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
6th |
36.3 M |
35.4 M |
+0.9 M |
97.52% |
| Trockenhandling |
10th |
115.1 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
99.05% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
5th |
43.3 M |
40.3 M |
+3 M |
93.07% |
| Nasshandling |
10th |
74.5 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.77% |
| Nasser Kreis |
8th |
6.24 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.32 m/s |
95.12% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
3rd |
85.2 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.16% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
4th |
4.79 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.33 m/sec2 |
93.55% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
3rd |
72.7 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.45% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
3rd |
38950 KM |
45250 KM |
-6300 KM |
86.08% |
| Wert |
9th |
11.3 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+3.86 Price/1000 |
65.84% |
| Preis |
20th |
440 |
265 |
+175 |
60.23% |
| Rollwiderstand |
12th |
8.16 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.68 kg / t |
91.67% |
Premiumprofil mit vorbildlicher Performance auf nasser und trockener Fahrbahn, kürzeste Nass- und Trockenbremswege, gute Laufleistung.
Keiner erwähnt.
Exemplarisch.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
1st |
35.4 M |
|
|
100% |
| Trockenhandling |
7th |
115.5 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.4% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
1st |
40.3 M |
|
|
100% |
| Nasshandling |
4th |
75.5 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.08% |
| Nasser Kreis |
2nd |
6.53 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.03 m/s |
99.54% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
9th |
82.5 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
95.05% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
11th |
4.51 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.61 m/sec2 |
88.09% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
16th |
74.1 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.57% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
5th |
30750 KM |
45250 KM |
-14500 KM |
67.96% |
| Wert |
17th |
12.85 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+5.41 Price/1000 |
57.9% |
| Preis |
17th |
395 |
265 |
+130 |
67.09% |
| Rollwiderstand |
11th |
8.08 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.6 kg / t |
92.57% |
Neues Sommerprofil mit ausgewogenen Fahreigenschaften, sicherem Nass-/Trocken-Handling, kurzen Bremswegen, sehr guter Laufleistung.
Keiner erwähnt.
Exemplarisch.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
14th |
36.9 M |
35.4 M |
+1.5 M |
95.93% |
| Trockenhandling |
12th |
114.7 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.71% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
9th |
43.6 M |
40.3 M |
+3.3 M |
92.43% |
| Nasshandling |
8th |
74.7 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.03% |
| Nasser Kreis |
5th |
6.29 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.27 m/s |
95.88% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
5th |
84.5 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
97.35% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
19th |
4.26 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.86 m/sec2 |
83.2% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
16th |
74.1 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.8 dB |
97.57% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
4th |
34400 KM |
45250 KM |
-10850 KM |
76.02% |
| Wert |
14th |
11.77 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.33 Price/1000 |
63.21% |
| Preis |
19th |
405 |
265 |
+140 |
65.43% |
| Rollwiderstand |
8th |
7.98 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.5 kg / t |
93.73% |
Hervorragende Laufleistung, stabiles und sicheres Fahrverhalten, moderater Preis, sehr gutes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis.
Mäßiger Grip bei Nässe.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
8th |
36.4 M |
35.4 M |
+1 M |
97.25% |
| Trockenhandling |
9th |
115.2 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
99.14% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
16th |
45.6 M |
40.3 M |
+5.3 M |
88.38% |
| Nasshandling |
14th |
74.2 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.38% |
| Nasser Kreis |
17th |
5.92 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.64 m/s |
90.24% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
19th |
81 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.8 Km/H |
93.32% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
14th |
4.49 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.63 m/sec2 |
87.7% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
1st |
72.3 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
1st |
45250 KM |
|
|
100% |
| Wert |
2nd |
8.29 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+0.85 Price/1000 |
89.75% |
| Preis |
16th |
375 |
265 |
+110 |
70.67% |
| Rollwiderstand |
2nd |
7.62 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.14 kg / t |
98.16% |
Überzeugende Leistung auf nasser und trockener Straße, kurze Nass- und Trockenbremswege, günstiger Preis.
Mäßiger Abrollkomfort.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
1st |
35.4 M |
|
|
100% |
| Trockenhandling |
3rd |
116 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.83% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
2nd |
40.8 M |
40.3 M |
+0.5 M |
98.77% |
| Nasshandling |
2nd |
75.7 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.34% |
| Nasser Kreis |
6th |
6.27 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.29 m/s |
95.58% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
10th |
82.4 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-4.4 Km/H |
94.93% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
21st |
4.18 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.94 m/sec2 |
81.64% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
7th |
73.1 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.91% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
12th |
27150 KM |
45250 KM |
-18100 KM |
60% |
| Wert |
5th |
9.94 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+2.5 Price/1000 |
74.85% |
| Preis |
2nd |
270 |
265 |
+5 |
98.15% |
| Rollwiderstand |
16th |
8.46 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.98 kg / t |
88.42% |
Markenreifen mit sportlich dynamischem Handling, kurzen Trockenbremswegen, gutem Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis.
Erhöhtes Rollgeräusch.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
10th |
36.6 M |
35.4 M |
+1.2 M |
96.72% |
| Trockenhandling |
5th |
115.7 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.57% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
13th |
44.9 M |
40.3 M |
+4.6 M |
89.76% |
| Nasshandling |
3rd |
75.6 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.21% |
| Nasser Kreis |
9th |
6.21 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.35 m/s |
94.66% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
4th |
84.7 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.58% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
8th |
4.72 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.4 m/sec2 |
92.19% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
21st |
74.5 dB |
72.3 dB |
+2.2 dB |
97.05% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
6th |
29850 KM |
45250 KM |
-15400 KM |
65.97% |
| Wert |
7th |
10.05 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+2.61 Price/1000 |
74.03% |
| Preis |
8th |
300 |
265 |
+35 |
88.33% |
| Rollwiderstand |
4th |
7.67 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.19 kg / t |
97.52% |
Gute Sicherheitsreserven gegen Aquaplaning, dynamisches Trockenhandling, kurze Trockenbremswege.
Begrenzte Lebensdauer des Profils.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
9th |
36.5 M |
35.4 M |
+1.1 M |
96.99% |
| Trockenhandling |
1st |
116.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
10th |
43.7 M |
40.3 M |
+3.4 M |
92.22% |
| Nasshandling |
10th |
74.5 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.77% |
| Nasser Kreis |
10th |
6.13 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.43 m/s |
93.45% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
6th |
83.4 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
96.08% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
5th |
4.77 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.35 m/sec2 |
93.16% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
13th |
73.7 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.1% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
14th |
25800 KM |
45250 KM |
-19450 KM |
57.02% |
| Wert |
12th |
11.63 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.19 Price/1000 |
63.97% |
| Preis |
8th |
300 |
265 |
+35 |
88.33% |
| Rollwiderstand |
13th |
8.22 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.74 kg / t |
91% |
Dynamisches Fahrverhalten auf nasser und trockener Straße, kurze Trockenbremswege, geringer Rollwiderstand.
Mäßige Profillebensdauer.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
3rd |
35.9 M |
35.4 M |
+0.5 M |
98.61% |
| Trockenhandling |
6th |
115.6 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.48% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
5th |
43.3 M |
40.3 M |
+3 M |
93.07% |
| Nasshandling |
13th |
74.3 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
97.51% |
| Nasser Kreis |
14th |
6.06 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.5 m/s |
92.38% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
14th |
81.3 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.5 Km/H |
93.66% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
18th |
4.38 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.74 m/sec2 |
85.55% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
9th |
73.3 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1 dB |
98.64% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
13th |
26250 KM |
45250 KM |
-19000 KM |
58.01% |
| Wert |
10th |
11.43 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+3.99 Price/1000 |
65.09% |
| Preis |
8th |
300 |
265 |
+35 |
88.33% |
| Rollwiderstand |
3rd |
7.65 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.17 kg / t |
97.78% |
Dynamisches Nass- und Trockenhandling, kurze Bremswege, leises Abrollgeräusch, moderates Preisniveau.
Geringe Profillebensdauer.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
12th |
36.7 M |
35.4 M |
+1.3 M |
96.46% |
| Trockenhandling |
3rd |
116 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.83% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
4th |
42.9 M |
40.3 M |
+2.6 M |
93.94% |
| Nasshandling |
5th |
75.4 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
98.95% |
| Nasser Kreis |
3rd |
6.4 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.16 m/s |
97.56% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
11th |
81.9 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-4.9 Km/H |
94.35% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
11th |
4.51 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.61 m/sec2 |
88.09% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
6th |
73 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.7 dB |
99.04% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
18th |
24450 KM |
45250 KM |
-20800 KM |
54.03% |
| Wert |
15th |
12.07 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.63 Price/1000 |
61.64% |
| Preis |
17th |
395 |
265 |
+130 |
67.09% |
| Rollwiderstand |
10th |
8.05 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.57 kg / t |
92.92% |
Gute Aquaplaning-Eigenschaften, kurze Trockenbremswege, spritsparender Rollwiderstand.
Durchschnittlicher Grip auf nassen Straßen.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
14th |
36.9 M |
35.4 M |
+1.5 M |
95.93% |
| Trockenhandling |
13th |
114.6 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.62% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
20th |
46.9 M |
40.3 M |
+6.6 M |
85.93% |
| Nasshandling |
19th |
73.3 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2.9 Km/H |
96.19% |
| Nasser Kreis |
17th |
5.92 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.64 m/s |
90.24% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
7th |
83.2 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-3.6 Km/H |
95.85% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
5th |
4.77 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.35 m/sec2 |
93.16% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
14th |
73.8 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.5 dB |
97.97% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
11th |
27600 KM |
45250 KM |
-17650 KM |
60.99% |
| Wert |
16th |
12.32 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.88 Price/1000 |
60.39% |
| Preis |
14th |
340 |
265 |
+75 |
77.94% |
| Rollwiderstand |
1st |
7.48 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Kurze Trockenbremswege, leises Geräusch, hervorragende Laufleistung, gute Wirtschaftlichkeit.
Mäßige Seitenführung auf trockener Fahrbahn.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
13th |
36.8 M |
35.4 M |
+1.4 M |
96.2% |
| Trockenhandling |
19th |
113.9 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
98.02% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
18th |
46.1 M |
40.3 M |
+5.8 M |
87.42% |
| Nasshandling |
16th |
74.1 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.24% |
| Nasser Kreis |
11th |
6.1 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.46 m/s |
92.99% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
20th |
80.6 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-6.2 Km/H |
92.86% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
3rd |
4.82 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.3 m/sec2 |
94.14% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
2nd |
72.5 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
2nd |
40300 KM |
45250 KM |
-4950 KM |
89.06% |
| Wert |
1st |
7.44 Price/1000 |
|
|
100% |
| Preis |
8th |
300 |
265 |
+35 |
88.33% |
| Rollwiderstand |
9th |
8.03 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.55 kg / t |
93.15% |
Dynamisches Trockenhandling, leises Abrollgeräusch, geringer Rollwiderstand, günstiger Preis.
Tendenz zum Untersteuern bei Nässe.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
17th |
37.4 M |
35.4 M |
+2 M |
94.65% |
| Trockenhandling |
11th |
114.9 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.88% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
15th |
45.4 M |
40.3 M |
+5.1 M |
88.77% |
| Nasshandling |
18th |
73.5 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
96.46% |
| Nasser Kreis |
19th |
5.86 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.7 m/s |
89.33% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
13th |
81.4 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.4 Km/H |
93.78% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
9th |
4.66 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.46 m/sec2 |
91.02% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
9th |
73.3 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1 dB |
98.64% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
15th |
25750 KM |
45250 KM |
-19500 KM |
56.91% |
| Wert |
11th |
11.46 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.02 Price/1000 |
64.92% |
| Preis |
5th |
295 |
265 |
+30 |
89.83% |
| Rollwiderstand |
5th |
7.73 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.25 kg / t |
96.77% |
Gute Aquaplaningsicherheit, kurze Trockenbremswege, guter Abrollkomfort.
Untersteuerndes Handling, mäßige Profillebensdauer.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
17th |
37.4 M |
35.4 M |
+2 M |
94.65% |
| Trockenhandling |
15th |
114.4 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
98.45% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
14th |
45 M |
40.3 M |
+4.7 M |
89.56% |
| Nasshandling |
17th |
73.6 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
96.59% |
| Nasser Kreis |
15th |
6.04 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.52 m/s |
92.07% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
8th |
82.8 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.39% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
13th |
4.5 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.62 m/sec2 |
87.89% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
4th |
72.9 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.18% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
16th |
25350 KM |
45250 KM |
-19900 KM |
56.02% |
| Wert |
13th |
11.64 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+4.2 Price/1000 |
63.92% |
| Preis |
5th |
295 |
265 |
+30 |
89.83% |
| Rollwiderstand |
6th |
7.8 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.32 kg / t |
95.9% |
Sichere Aquaplaning-Eigenschaften, kurze Trockenbremswege, sehr günstiger Preis.
Durchschnittlicher Grip auf nassen und trockenen Straßen.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
17th |
37.4 M |
35.4 M |
+2 M |
94.65% |
| Trockenhandling |
14th |
114.5 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
98.54% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
17th |
45.8 M |
40.3 M |
+5.5 M |
87.99% |
| Nasshandling |
14th |
74.2 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.38% |
| Nasser Kreis |
16th |
6.01 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.55 m/s |
91.62% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
12th |
81.7 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.1 Km/H |
94.12% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
16th |
4.45 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.67 m/sec2 |
86.91% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
15th |
73.9 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.6 dB |
97.83% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
7th |
29450 KM |
45250 KM |
-15800 KM |
65.08% |
| Wert |
3rd |
9 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+1.56 Price/1000 |
82.67% |
| Preis |
1st |
265 |
|
|
100% |
| Rollwiderstand |
15th |
8.43 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.95 kg / t |
88.73% |
Sicheres Nasshandling, kurze Trockenbremswege, moderater Preis.
Tendenz zum Untersteuern auf trockener Fahrbahn, sehr hoher Rollwiderstand.
Gut.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
10th |
36.6 M |
35.4 M |
+1.2 M |
96.72% |
| Trockenhandling |
17th |
114.3 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.36% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
19th |
46.5 M |
40.3 M |
+6.2 M |
86.67% |
| Nasshandling |
10th |
74.5 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.77% |
| Nasser Kreis |
12th |
6.09 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.47 m/s |
92.84% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
14th |
81.3 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.5 Km/H |
93.66% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
15th |
4.47 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.65 m/sec2 |
87.3% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
20th |
74.4 dB |
72.3 dB |
+2.1 dB |
97.18% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
9th |
29400 KM |
45250 KM |
-15850 KM |
64.97% |
| Wert |
6th |
10.03 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+2.59 Price/1000 |
74.18% |
| Preis |
5th |
295 |
265 |
+30 |
89.83% |
| Rollwiderstand |
21st |
9.19 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+1.71 kg / t |
81.39% |
Kurze Trockenbremswege, dynamische Lenkung und Handhabung.
Zufriedenstellende Lebensdauer und Wirtschaftlichkeit, erhöhtes Preisniveau.
Befriedigend.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
6th |
36.3 M |
35.4 M |
+0.9 M |
97.52% |
| Trockenhandling |
8th |
115.4 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.31% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
11th |
44.4 M |
40.3 M |
+4.1 M |
90.77% |
| Nasshandling |
9th |
74.6 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.9% |
| Nasser Kreis |
13th |
6.08 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.48 m/s |
92.68% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
18th |
81.1 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.7 Km/H |
93.43% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
9th |
4.66 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.46 m/sec2 |
91.02% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
11th |
73.6 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.23% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
17th |
24900 KM |
45250 KM |
-20350 KM |
55.03% |
| Wert |
18th |
14.46 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+7.02 Price/1000 |
51.45% |
| Preis |
15th |
360 |
265 |
+95 |
73.61% |
| Rollwiderstand |
14th |
8.36 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.88 kg / t |
89.47% |
Gute Bremsleistung, dynamisches Nasshandling.
Verzögerte Lenkreaktion, begrenzte Profillebensdauer/Wirtschaftlichkeit.
Befriedigend.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
16th |
37.2 M |
35.4 M |
+1.8 M |
95.16% |
| Trockenhandling |
15th |
114.4 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
98.45% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
5th |
43.3 M |
40.3 M |
+3 M |
93.07% |
| Nasshandling |
6th |
75.3 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.82% |
| Nasser Kreis |
6th |
6.27 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.29 m/s |
95.58% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
21st |
80.2 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-6.6 Km/H |
92.4% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
17th |
4.43 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.69 m/sec2 |
86.52% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
8th |
73.2 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.77% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
19th |
19450 KM |
45250 KM |
-25800 KM |
42.98% |
| Wert |
19th |
14.91 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+7.47 Price/1000 |
49.9% |
| Preis |
3rd |
290 |
265 |
+25 |
91.38% |
| Rollwiderstand |
17th |
8.6 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+1.12 kg / t |
86.98% |
Gute Aquaplaningeigenschaften, sicheres Nässehandling.
Unscharfes Handling und eingeschränkte Seitenführung auf trockener Straße.
Befriedigend.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
20th |
37.9 M |
35.4 M |
+2.5 M |
93.4% |
| Trockenhandling |
20th |
113.8 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.93% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
5th |
43.3 M |
40.3 M |
+3 M |
93.07% |
| Nasshandling |
7th |
74.8 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.16% |
| Nasser Kreis |
4th |
6.34 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.22 m/s |
96.65% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
2nd |
85.3 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.27% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
2nd |
5 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.12 m/sec2 |
97.66% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
4th |
72.9 dB |
72.3 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.18% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
10th |
27650 KM |
45250 KM |
-17600 KM |
61.1% |
| Wert |
8th |
10.85 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+3.41 Price/1000 |
68.57% |
| Preis |
8th |
300 |
265 |
+35 |
88.33% |
| Rollwiderstand |
7th |
7.93 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+0.45 kg / t |
94.33% |
Gute Laufleistung, kurze Trockenbremswege.
Verzögerte Lenkreaktion, mäßiges Gripniveau auf nasser und trockener Straße.
Befriedigend.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
5th |
36.2 M |
35.4 M |
+0.8 M |
97.79% |
| Trockenhandling |
18th |
114.1 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
98.19% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
11th |
44.4 M |
40.3 M |
+4.1 M |
90.77% |
| Nasshandling |
20th |
73.1 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
95.93% |
| Nasser Kreis |
20th |
5.68 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-0.88 m/s |
86.59% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
14th |
81.3 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.5 Km/H |
93.66% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
7th |
4.74 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.38 m/sec2 |
92.58% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
18th |
74.2 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.9 dB |
97.44% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
7th |
29450 KM |
45250 KM |
-15800 KM |
65.08% |
| Wert |
4th |
9.85 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+2.41 Price/1000 |
75.53% |
| Preis |
3rd |
290 |
265 |
+25 |
91.38% |
| Rollwiderstand |
19th |
8.83 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+1.35 kg / t |
84.71% |
Hervorragende Fahrdynamik, kurze Nass- und Trockenbremswege, sehr gute Aquaplaning-Eigenschaften.
Geringe Profillebensdauer, erhöhter Rollwiderstand.
Bedingt empfehlenswert.
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
4th |
36.1 M |
35.4 M |
+0.7 M |
98.06% |
| Trockenhandling |
2nd |
116.1 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-0.1 Km/H |
99.91% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
3rd |
41.6 M |
40.3 M |
+1.3 M |
96.88% |
| Nasshandling |
1st |
76.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Nasser Kreis |
1st |
6.56 m/s |
|
|
100% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
1st |
86.8 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
1st |
5.12 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
11th |
73.6 dB |
72.3 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.23% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Verschleiß |
20th |
15400 KM |
45250 KM |
-29850 KM |
34.03% |
| Wert |
20th |
19.81 Price/1000 |
7.44 Price/1000 |
+12.37 Price/1000 |
37.56% |
| Preis |
13th |
305 |
265 |
+40 |
86.89% |
| Rollwiderstand |
18th |
8.81 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+1.33 kg / t |
84.9% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Trockenbremsen |
21st |
39.6 M |
35.4 M |
+4.2 M |
89.39% |
| Trockenhandling |
21st |
112.9 Km/H |
116.2 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
97.16% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Nassbremsen |
21st |
52.5 M |
40.3 M |
+12.2 M |
76.76% |
| Nasshandling |
21st |
64.7 Km/H |
76.2 Km/H |
-11.5 Km/H |
84.91% |
| Nasser Kreis |
21st |
4.67 m/s |
6.56 m/s |
-1.89 m/s |
71.19% |
| Aquaplaning geradeaus |
17th |
81.2 Km/H |
86.8 Km/H |
-5.6 Km/H |
93.55% |
| Kurven Aquaplaning |
20th |
4.21 m/sec2 |
5.12 m/sec2 |
-0.91 m/sec2 |
82.23% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Geräusch |
19th |
74.3 dB |
72.3 dB |
+2 dB |
97.31% |
| Prüfen |
# |
Ergebnis |
Am besten |
Diff |
% |
| Rollwiderstand |
20th |
8.95 kg / t |
7.48 kg / t |
+1.47 kg / t |
83.58% |