Die besten Reifen für den Mazda 626

Schlechteste Reifen aller Zeiten. Ich fuhr mit konstanten 55 km/h einen moderaten Hügel bei Nässe hinauf und begann, langsamer zu werden. Er ließ einen Gang herunter und fragte sich, was los war. Die Reifen hatten bei Nässe nicht genug Traktion, um mit konstanter Geschwindigkeit den Berg hinaufzufahren. Meine Tochter hatte damit einen Unfall. Praktisch null Bremsvermögen bei leichten Steigungen bei Nässe (Bremsen wurden 3 Tage zuvor überprüft). Im trockenen, auf heißem Asphalt musste die Kupplung rutschen, um Reifenquietschen / Traktionsverlust zu vermeiden. Fahrzeug war ein 2,0-Liter-Mazda 626-Handbuch. Absolute Death Trap-Reifen. Nach der Reparatur des Fahrzeugs wurden die Reifen entfernt und durch Pirelli P7 Cinturato ersetzt, die im Vergleich absolut brillant sind und keine der Probleme der Dunlops aufwiesen. KAUFEN SIE NIEMALS DIESE REIFEN

Mein erster Eco-Reifen und aus dieser Erfahrung glaube ich meinen letzten, zumindest für eine Weile. Während der Rollwiderstand merklich verringert wird und das Auto beim Ausrollen zur Ampel langsamer abbremst, scheint es zumindest in dieser Iteration viel zu viele Kompromisse für diesen geringeren Rollwiderstand zu geben, was in meinem Fall zu einer Kraftstoffeinsparung von etwa 2-3 Prozent führt.

Die Fahrt ist etwas schwieriger als bei allen anderen "Touring" -Reifen, die ich hatte, und der nasse Grip, insbesondere das Bremsen auf feuchten Oberflächen, ist ziemlich düster. Darüber hinaus wird dieser schlechte Nassgriff auch nicht durch geringen Verschleiß ausgeglichen, und es sieht so aus, als würde ich nur meine durchschnittlichen 20 km von meinem Set entfernt (nur einmal von vorne nach hinten "gedreht"). Der Verschleiß ist jedoch gleichmäßig und die Reifen halten das Gleichgewicht gut.

Positiv zu vermerken ist, dass die Reifen auf allen Oberflächen leise sind und im Trockenen gut greifen und gut handhaben. Und sie waren preiswert.

Ich kann nicht anders, als zu glauben, dass jeder der Tourenreifen (ohne Öko-Reifen), die ich für dieses Auto verwendet habe, diesen TEO Plus in ALLEN Aspekten übertroffen hätte, indem er nur den Druck um 10 Prozent gegenüber den empfohlenen erhöht hätte. Ich hatte definitiv mehr von Toyo erwartet.

Great winter tyres, on dry these Yokohamas are like summer tyres, grip is excellent. On wet there is no problem, even a few cm of water was not a big deal but that was not with highway speed, up to 80kmph. Snow traction is great, no problem in deep snow but I had only one trip on snow in town so it is hard to say how good they are on snow.
They are comfortable, but should be better. Will buy again definitelly.
Thread pattern is similar to Continental, but I like this one more :D.

I bought these tyres because they won most tyre tests. I was verry happy with them when they were new. Good grip on dry and wet, I was able to go faster then other cars when heavy rain (but that may be in drivers heads or tyre size and not the actual tyres).

Every year, with depth of the tread going down, they were worse and worse. They got hard every year. Fifth year, they were worse then my winter tyres in spring when I changed tyres. They had about 4mm tread. So the more you drive, the worse the tyres get.
They were pretty expensive (comparing to others in this size) so I expected more from them.
Last year, I got puncture when I accidentally drive over hidden curb, sidewall was destroyed - 10 holes on outerside, 3 on innerside. Maybe my fault, but I got worse accident with different and older tyres (on old car) without problem.

Won't buy again, for me, Continental makes tyres for tests, tyres changes a lot with years and wear.

My first Toyo tyres and not the last. I switched to these Toyo tyres after Continental ContiPremium 5. Conti were great, but every year worse and worse.

Tyres feels glued to the road on dry and wet conditions. I was too fast in one curve, which was sharper then I expected and I believed that I will slide but the tyres hold me on the road.
Sidewall is too soft, I can feel it during faster cornering but that means they are comfortable. Harder sidewalls a little and loosing some comfort would be better. Soft sidewall also means longer reaction when turning the steering wheel.
I have no problem with the tyres during heavy rain on highway with 130km/h speed, they feels safe on wet. No problem with braking on dry or wet. I think that they brake on wet much better then Continentals.

Wear is not visible yet, but I am low on mileage so no problem for me if wear too fast, I will have to change to new tyres after 4 year if weared to 3mm or 6mm.

No sliding the wheels during fast starts - kickdowns. I had a lot of these, usually on wet with Continentals..

Made in JAPAN.

Absolutely brillant! After 10000 miles tyres still keep the comfort. Wet and dry drive is excellent. I used them in snowy road and surprisingly good at snow. I will but it again or try next model.

Dangerous on wet roads. Wheel slip on our Mazda 626 front wheel drive car

We need to drive slowly and use our other car if it rains. Don't buy, we need to replace them even though they are not worn out. Bad idea, was not helped by the tyre retailer.

The fronts lasted 19000 miles backs 35000 in fact still going when car was scrapped. I found the handling to be good but then i,m no boy racer. As with so many things in life tyres are a compromise. The compromise of a hard compound tyre such as Mechelin energy is some loss in grip. That why bike sports tyres are dual compound If i had a Mazda mx5 and not a 626 family saloon i would not buy Mechelin energy tyres. However because (in order of priority) i value safety comfort longevity and economy these tyres are the ones for me. And I think tread pattern can only do so much to improve handling. So as for Price per mile Michelin energy tyres just can't be beat. Boy racers these tyres are not for you!