Menu

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

4 Reifen im Vergleich 5 gemeinsame Tests Sommer
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Sommer · Ultra High Performance
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
5
Losses
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Sommer · Maximale Performance
Tyre Reviews9.3
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
3
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Sommer · Maximale Performance
Tyre Reviews9.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
1
Draw
4
Losses
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Sommer · Maximale Performance
Tyre Reviews9.7
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
1
Draw
3
Losses

Kategoriengewichtung anpassen

Passen Sie die Gewichtung der einzelnen Leistungskategorien an, um zu sehen, wie sich unterschiedliche Prioritäten auf die Gesamtrangliste aller gemeinsamen Tests auswirken.

Trocken 35%
Nass 50%
Komfort 5%
Wert 10%
Trocken 35% · Nass 50% · Komfort 5% · Wert 10%
Feinabstimmung der Unterkategorien
Trocken
Nass
Komfort
Wert
RangReifenPunktzahlTrockenNassKomfortWert
1Bridgestone Potenza Sport98.2%99.2%99.1%97.7%90.4%
2Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 698.1%98.2%98.4%98.8%95.5%
3Michelin Pilot Sport 598.1%97.6%98.7%98.3%96.5%
4Yokohama Advan Sport V10794.5%98.6%94.3%96.3%80.4%

Kategorienübersicht

Detaillierte Aufschlüsselungen

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Subj. Fun [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Cool [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Worn [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Subj. Noise [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-für-Test-Bilanz (Siege/Unentschieden/Niederlagen)
In diesem Vergleich enthaltene Tests