Kategoriengewichtung anpassen
Passen Sie die Gewichtung der einzelnen Leistungskategorien an, um zu sehen, wie sich unterschiedliche Prioritäten auf die Gesamtrangliste aller gemeinsamen Tests auswirken.
Trocken 35% · Nass 50% · Komfort 5% · Wert 10%
Feinabstimmung der Unterkategorien
Trocken
Nass
Komfort
Wert
| Rang | Reifen | Punktzahl | Trocken | Nass | Komfort | Wert |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 98.5% | 99.9% | 97.3% | 97.4% | 100% |
| 2 | Vredestein Ultrac | 96.2% | 98.5% | 99.6% | 99.7% | 69.8% |
Kategorienübersicht
Detaillierte Aufschlüsselungen
Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [s] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Dry Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [s] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Subj. Wet Handling [Points] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [s] (lower is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Subj. Comfort [Points] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-für-Test-Bilanz (Siege/Unentschieden/Niederlagen)
| Rang | Reifen | Siege | Unentschieden | Verluste |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | Vredestein Ultrac | 0 | 1 | 5 |
In diesem Vergleich enthaltene Tests
- 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview (2022, 215/55 R17)
- 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (2022, 215/55 R17)
- Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres (2023, 205/55 R16)
- 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (2024, 205/55 R16)
- 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (2024, 215/55 R17)
- 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (2024, 205/55 R16)