Menu

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

3 Reifen im Vergleich 7 gemeinsame Tests Sommer
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Sommer · Premium Tourenwagen
Tyre Reviews9.3
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
4
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Sommer · Premium Tourenwagen
Tyre Reviews8.6
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
3
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Sommer · Premium Tourenwagen
Tyre Reviews8.1
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
7
Losses

Kategoriengewichtung anpassen

Passen Sie die Gewichtung der einzelnen Leistungskategorien an, um zu sehen, wie sich unterschiedliche Prioritäten auf die Gesamtrangliste aller gemeinsamen Tests auswirken.

Trocken 35%
Nass 50%
Komfort 5%
Wert 10%
Trocken 35% · Nass 50% · Komfort 5% · Wert 10%
Feinabstimmung der Unterkategorien
Trocken
Nass
Komfort
Wert
RangReifenPunktzahlTrockenNassKomfortWert
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 298.8%99.4%98.4%99.2%98.1%
2Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun98.1%100%99.9%97.3%82.8%
3Kleber Dynaxer HP496%99%95.3%99%87.2%

Kategorienübersicht

Detaillierte Aufschlüsselungen

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-für-Test-Bilanz (Siege/Unentschieden/Niederlagen)
In diesem Vergleich enthaltene Tests