Menu

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

3 Reifen im Vergleich 3 gemeinsame Tests Sommer
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Sommer · Maximale Performance
Tyre Reviews8.1
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Sommer · Premium Tourenwagen
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
2
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Sommer · Premium Tourenwagen
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
1
Loss

Kategoriengewichtung anpassen

Passen Sie die Gewichtung der einzelnen Leistungskategorien an, um zu sehen, wie sich unterschiedliche Prioritäten auf die Gesamtrangliste aller gemeinsamen Tests auswirken.

Trocken 35%
Nass 50%
Komfort 5%
Wert 10%
Trocken 35% · Nass 50% · Komfort 5% · Wert 10%
Feinabstimmung der Unterkategorien
Trocken
Nass
Komfort
Wert
RangReifenPunktzahlTrockenNassKomfortWert
1Kumho Ecsta HS5297.6%99.3%96.3%99.3%97.1%
2Hankook Ventus Prime 497.2%99.9%96.5%100%89.4%
3Dunlop SportMaxx RT 296%98.9%97.5%99.1%77.1%

Kategorienübersicht

Detaillierte Aufschlüsselungen

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test-für-Test-Bilanz (Siege/Unentschieden/Niederlagen)
RangReifenSiegeUnentschiedenVerluste
1Hankook Ventus Prime 4201
2Kumho Ecsta HS52102
3Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2003
In diesem Vergleich enthaltene Tests